>>40857982
<3
if youd have asked me
>how do you recognize a moment
id have replied the incontinences of its momentum, after imbibing your reply i believe were very much on the same page

>>40554139
nope, cant measure contents that changes scale as a function of proximity to the continence, meowences or otherwise. its like saying the speed of light is 299,792,458 m/s - fucking retarded