>>507848576
>It's extremely well documented
But all your "documents" are testimonies which can systematically be proven as fraudulent or unsubstantiated
>Which ones?
Well look at this dozen of fake testimonies, even the first 3 presented at Nuremberg, supposedly the strongest since they were used to open the trials, are provably fake
>Well we still have thousands more so that doesn't count!
But look, a team of people have gathered errors in those testimonies for decades, they've proven thousands of testimonies are wrong
>It's the trauma that makes them remember non-important details you evil goyim, and we still have thousands more, it's very well documented, stop asking questions or you'll go to jail like the 90 years old grandma