>>40735601
>everyone looks at the same object
But each light is looking at the object from a different position.
I am saying - and my pic is offering an example - of two people looking at the object from the exact same position, and subjectively deciding on very different conclusions that are nevertheless both true.
another pic related.
It isnt that if you look from the back, or turn it upside down, or if you squint, or any of that.
Everyone can be in the same place, with the same background, and the same info, and still they can say
>it's a duck
or
>it's a rabbit
And BOTH of them are true.
Not,
>it's a duck this way, but if you turn it like this it is now a rabbit
No.
Duck is true. Rabbit is true. Duck is not rabbit.
The difference is the subjective decision to see one or the other.
With the light on the object, it isnnt that you can stand where the object appears to be a circle and just decide what you are seeing is a square.
you would have to move your position to be truthful in saying "I see a square."