Search Results
6/25/2025, 6:26:34 AM
>>279941334
Ok so from what I understand in this thread, rifujin won again and went all in didn’t go back on his word, bumpslut’s narrative fell once more, more news at 11.not only did Aisha arc not disappear in fact from what I saw Japs commenting on 5ch Rifujin doubled and even tripled down in terms of writing kek.
Tbqh I knew this beforehand because the praise Aisha arc got from people who actually matter:
>https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/interview/2021-04-09/mushoku-tensei-jobless-reincarnation-director-and-producer/.170995
>(For Okamoto) What was your first impression of the original work?
>It had a lot of vulgar and uncomfortable parts, but ultimately I thought it was a first-rate story. On the Narо̄ website, there was a part called the “Aisha arc” that has now been removed because it was controversial. In it, the protagonist is finally able to acknowledge who he was in his previous life, but to put it in words would reduce his entire reincarnated life to that one thing. It's because that story took the form of an online novel, a hallowed ground that the hand of a commercial editor could not reach, that it was able to depict a single person's life with so much richness. By the time I read it, it already had a lot of fans, so I felt more pressure to create an anime that could do justice to the story for their sake.
Heavy indications that Aisha arc would return in LN form this basically vindicated Rifujin and gave him the OK to write whatever he wants also since MT will be a long term project this part might get adapted as well.
Ok so from what I understand in this thread, rifujin won again and went all in didn’t go back on his word, bumpslut’s narrative fell once more, more news at 11.not only did Aisha arc not disappear in fact from what I saw Japs commenting on 5ch Rifujin doubled and even tripled down in terms of writing kek.
Tbqh I knew this beforehand because the praise Aisha arc got from people who actually matter:
>https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/interview/2021-04-09/mushoku-tensei-jobless-reincarnation-director-and-producer/.170995
>(For Okamoto) What was your first impression of the original work?
>It had a lot of vulgar and uncomfortable parts, but ultimately I thought it was a first-rate story. On the Narо̄ website, there was a part called the “Aisha arc” that has now been removed because it was controversial. In it, the protagonist is finally able to acknowledge who he was in his previous life, but to put it in words would reduce his entire reincarnated life to that one thing. It's because that story took the form of an online novel, a hallowed ground that the hand of a commercial editor could not reach, that it was able to depict a single person's life with so much richness. By the time I read it, it already had a lot of fans, so I felt more pressure to create an anime that could do justice to the story for their sake.
Heavy indications that Aisha arc would return in LN form this basically vindicated Rifujin and gave him the OK to write whatever he wants also since MT will be a long term project this part might get adapted as well.
Page 1