>>512743454
>Imagine thinking undercover feds can't lie under oath..
Really? Show the legal grounding for that. Even if true, can you do that to Feds that are after you and want to jail you?

>>512739795
>Because he went off the record for 2 minutes get legal counsel about whether he could actually lie
Document your claim, stupid Jew
>And informants like him are allowed to lie to protect their cover.
They are not, it will be redacted and not released to the pubic. Only foreign service intelligence operatives of high rank can do that, i.e. high level CIA assets.
>and storm the Capitol building?
He didn't say storm the building and it is protected free speech, nasty Jew,

>>512742079
Endorcing her candidacy as part of a tactical cooperation is not endorsing her as a person or her Jewishness, Shlomo. Sorry.

>>512742374
>Norway flag
I am Norwegian. I see you use the accuse the accuser from your JIDF folder, deranged Jew. Why are you nasty Jews always so easy to detect and why do you all have this hysterical hatred of Nick Fuentes? Pic related.