>The Israeli military struck the entrance of the Syrian Defence Ministry building and near the presidential palace in central Damascus.
>Israel stated the strike was intended to shield Druze communities from military attacks by Syrian government forces.
>Truthfully, Israel has never cared about the Druze, as they are not Jewish. Its attacks on Syria appear to be part of a broader strategy to destabilize the country politically, and possibly linked to long-standing ambitions surrounding the establishment of Greater Israel.
>International law prohibits one country from attacking another without UN approval or self-defense justification.
>Syria did not directly attack Israel in these recent events, so Israeli strikes are viewed as illegal aggression.
>Israeli airstrikes have killed and injured civilians in Syria, including in populated areas like Damascus.
>Critics argue that Israel's actions escalate conflict and bring more suffering to people already in crisis.
>Some say Israel demands peace and security while regularly violating neighboring countries' airspace.
>If any other country did similar cross-border strikes, it would likely face global condemnation.
>The Syrian Druze conflict is an internal matter. Foreign military involvement can make things worse, not better.
>Israel’s actions can be seen as politically motivated, not purely humanitarian.

The burden of Damascus. Behold, Damascus is taken away from being a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap.
Isaiah 17:1