>EA killed Veilguard by demanding live service from a single player game, driving off the creative director, and then realizing live service is unpopular cancer and wanting it single player again in a schizo u-turn, among a plethora of other things
>EA is also trying to support the very scheme that cost it hundreds of millions, if not a billion, in financial losses

How does one get to this level of mental retardation and incompetence? Was the ferret rapist in charge of live service Veilguard? Was the gnome dildo his attempts at creative inspiration for the game? We'll never know.