>>510713561
If we go by "ancient" sources, "Spartans" were ancient Dorians. The invasion of Canaan was an even earlier Aryan migration. Both genetic incursions were largely a failure as they had only a minimal impact on local peoples.

>Jesus specifically said
all these specifics are garbage and must be ignored.
This is how it works:
>option A
either you believe in the bible's infallible words, which means you believe in a jewish, living document were all specifics were doctored around for centuries by various rabbis. The time when White christians would got the prerogative of interpretation or canonization ot text was far in the future.
Why would you do that? Why believe in obvious untruths? I mean one can choose to go with a Weltanschauung which is dissonant at best. We have names for people like that: retard/angsty teenager/child and so on.
Option A is full on judaism. Which is why the hardcore retards larp as jews.

>option B
or you believe in a very broad, realistic and "historical" interpretation. One which is getting harder and harder to follow because of the many discoveries we made in the last 30 years in various disciplines like
>genetics
>archeology
>philology
>White power
option B will nontheless tell you that highly specific wordings would be the product of a clergy's consensus, not jesus' words.

The bigbrain take is to disregard the bible and recognise the Spartans as an ahistorical dublication of the 13th century. We're talking about Franks, not Greek dindu-hafus inventing their own antiquity.