>>103265301
my guess is that "headwear" works because it is a part of a lot of tags, giving it strong semantic relevance

most high count tags which have "neckwear" seem to be depreciated, so I don't know if it'll work as well

"choker" on the other hand, is a part of a lot of tags, which is probably why it worked well for me

Note: sometimes, you do have to NegPip a very specific tag
Eg: You want a white collared shirt, but white sailor collar is bleeding because of school uniform, so you can directly NegPip "sailor collar"
Similarly you can NegPip "school uniform" if you want a normal shirt and jacket

>negatives
I don't put them in negative because of how negative works
Putting stuff in negative is not exactly subtracting that concept from the image like how NegPip does
It is more like adding that concept to the base result from which CFG takes the result of the prompt away from (Higher the CFG, the further away it takes it)

Also, it is advisable to avoid having anything in the neg for the initial steps (see https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.07724)

typically, I only have "lowres" as my neg applied from 30% onwards
I do keep tags that potentially can cause composition changes if used in NegPip like "pussy" in the neg though

N.B. 1
"sweat, shiny skin" with NegPip reduces that typical slop style bias

N.B. 2
You can also use NegPip in the Hires-fix step specifically to remove stuff that show up when you use higher denoise like areola peek, navel, cameltoe, pussy peek, etc

>>103265398
nta, quite surprising
Rosemi knows Japanese?

>>103259396