>>713974535
OP is is on to the right idea but he's still a faggot.
Only like like .05% percent of people can run a successful business and buy expensive cars now because it's not 1958 anymore. Anyway he doesn't understand the point of videogames.
Instead of buying a retarded sports car for $200,000 I could spend $500 on a good racing peripheral and treat it like the toy it really is.
And no matter how "in control" I feel I'm not going to be ordering around medieval troops to lay siege to some city... right? Samething with city design and so on. Half of these simulators is for checking things out and seeing what looks cool. The other half is being able to do comically ridiculous shit like the one-road city or the only-siege equipment army. Also there's games like Tribes where nothing in real life is going to come close.
But anyway the number of good adventurous jobs out there is pretty minuscule and usually you're filing taxes for sleaze corporation that wants to wring more money out of people by making their glob additives more addictive. It doesn't have to be this way, but it is right now.
Videogames are a great mercy, if you're not cut out to be a formula one racer, you can still play pretend as one with your videogame game.