Search Results
6/29/2025, 1:49:23 AM
>>508993726
Just because Tibet is a small nation, doesn't mean anyone can come and occupy it.
>In the early 20th century, Tibet was functionally independent, with its own government, culture, and Buddhist leadership under the Dalai Lama. But China, especially after the Communist Party took over in 1949, saw Tibet as part of its territory, citing false historical claims from the Qing Dynasty.
>In 1950, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled into eastern Tibet, claiming it was "liberating" the region from feudalism and foreign influence. Tibet’s small, outdated military didn’t stand a chance. By 1951, under pressure, Tibetan leaders signed the Seventeen Point Agreement, which promised autonomy but effectively put Tibet under Chinese control.
China, till date occupies Tibet and refuses to citizens of Tobet to live freely.
Just because Tibet is a small nation, doesn't mean anyone can come and occupy it.
>In the early 20th century, Tibet was functionally independent, with its own government, culture, and Buddhist leadership under the Dalai Lama. But China, especially after the Communist Party took over in 1949, saw Tibet as part of its territory, citing false historical claims from the Qing Dynasty.
>In 1950, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled into eastern Tibet, claiming it was "liberating" the region from feudalism and foreign influence. Tibet’s small, outdated military didn’t stand a chance. By 1951, under pressure, Tibetan leaders signed the Seventeen Point Agreement, which promised autonomy but effectively put Tibet under Chinese control.
China, till date occupies Tibet and refuses to citizens of Tobet to live freely.
Page 1