>>935861716
correct, except not vace. just the basic t2v workflow. gen times are 60 seconds per 5 second clip, loving life. i used to spend 8 minutes genning a 5 second i2v clip with my old WAN gguf workflow.

hope ya like film vfi. it's been my trusty go-to for well over a month now. vid related wouldn't be half as smooth without it (literally lol)

>>935861716
correct, except not vace. just the basic t2v workflow. gen times are 60 seconds per 5 second clip, loving life. i used to spend 8 minutes genning a 5 second i2v clip with my old WAN gguf workflow.

hope ya like film vfi. it's been my trusty go-to for well over a month now. vid related wouldn't be half as smooth without it (literally lol)

>>935861716
correct, except not vace. just the basic t2v workflow. gen times are 60 seconds per 5 second clip, loving life. i used to spend 8 minutes genning a 5 second i2v clip with my old WAN gguf workflow.

hope ya like film vfi. it's been my trusty go-to for well over a month now. vid related wouldn't be half as smooth without it (literally lol)

>>935861716
correct, except not vace. just the basic t2v workflow. gen times are 60 seconds per 5 second clip, loving life. i used to spend 8 minutes genning a 5 second i2v clip with my old WAN gguf workflow.

hope ya like film vfi. it's been my trusty go-to for well over a month now. vid related wouldn't be half as smooth without it (literally lol)

>>935861716
correct, except not vace. just the basic t2v workflow. gen times are 60 seconds per 5 second clip, loving life. i used to spend 8 minutes genning a 5 second i2v clip with my old WAN gguf workflow.

hope ya like film vfi. it's been my trusty go-to for well over a month now. vid related wouldn't be half as smooth without it (literally lol)

>>935861716
correct, except not vace. just the basic t2v workflow. gen times are 60 seconds per 5 second clip, loving life. i used to spend 8 minutes genning a 5 second i2v clip with my old WAN gguf workflow.

hope ya like film vfi. it's been my trusty go-to for well over a month now. vid related wouldn't be half as smooth without it (literally lol)

>>935861716
correct, except not vace. just the basic t2v workflow. gen times are 60 seconds per 5 second clip, loving life. i used to spend 8 minutes genning a 5 second i2v clip with my old WAN gguf workflow.

hope ya like film vfi. it's been my trusty go-to for well over a month now. vid related wouldn't be half as smooth without it (literally lol)

>>935861716
correct, except not vace. just the basic t2v workflow. gen times are 60 seconds per 5 second clip, loving life. i used to spend 8 minutes genning a 5 second i2v clip with my old WAN gguf workflow.

hope ya like film vfi. it's been my trusty go-to for well over a month now. vid related wouldn't be half as smooth without it (literally lol)

>>935861716
correct, except not vace. just the basic t2v workflow. gen times are 60 seconds per 5 second clip, loving life. i used to spend 8 minutes genning a 5 second i2v clip with my old WAN gguf workflow.

hope ya like film vfi. it's been my trusty go-to for well over a month now. vid related wouldn't be half as smooth without it (literally lol)

>>935861716
correct, except not vace. just the basic t2v workflow. gen times are 60 seconds per 5 second clip, loving life. i used to spend 8 minutes genning a 5 second i2v clip with my old WAN gguf workflow.

hope ya like film vfi. it's been my trusty go-to for well over a month now. vid related wouldn't be half as smooth without it (literally lol)

>>935861716
correct, except not vace. just the basic t2v workflow. gen times are 60 seconds per 5 second clip, loving life. i used to spend 8 minutes genning a 5 second i2v clip with my old WAN gguf workflow.

hope ya like film vfi. it's been my trusty go-to for well over a month now. vid related wouldn't be half as smooth without it (literally lol)

>>935861716
correct, except not vace. just the basic t2v workflow. gen times are 60 seconds per 5 second clip, loving life. i used to spend 8 minutes genning a 5 second i2v clip with my old WAN gguf workflow.

hope ya like film vfi. it's been my trusty go-to for well over a month now. vid related wouldn't be half as smooth without it (literally lol)

>>935861716
correct, except not vace. just the basic t2v workflow. gen times are 60 seconds per 5 second clip, loving life. i used to spend 8 minutes genning a 5 second i2v clip with my old WAN gguf workflow.

hope ya like film vfi. it's been my trusty go-to for well over a month now. vid related wouldn't be half as smooth without it (literally lol)

>>935861716
correct, except not vace. just the basic t2v workflow. gen times are 60 seconds per 5 second clip, loving life. i used to spend 8 minutes genning a 5 second i2v clip with my old WAN gguf workflow.

hope ya like film vfi. it's been my trusty go-to for well over a month now. vid related wouldn't be half as smooth without it (literally lol)

>>935861716
correct, except not vace. just the basic t2v workflow. gen times are 60 seconds per 5 second clip, loving life. i used to spend 8 minutes genning a 5 second i2v clip with my old WAN gguf workflow.

hope ya like film vfi. it's been my trusty go-to for well over a month now. vid related wouldn't be half as smooth without it (literally lol)

>>935861716
correct, except not vace. just the basic t2v workflow. gen times are 60 seconds per 5 second clip, loving life. i used to spend 8 minutes genning a 5 second i2v clip with my old WAN gguf workflow.

hope ya like film vfi. it's been my trusty go-to for well over a month now. vid related wouldn't be half as smooth without it (literally lol)

>>935781413
>topless boys are not sexual and can probably be posted in certain contexts on this site.
uhh kek, a literal toddler sexually rubbing a woman very b&. let's not try to pretend.