Search Results
7/25/2025, 1:05:22 AM
(Steven Pinker and Dershowitz both close accomplices of Jeffrey Epstein)
"A strong consensus has formed: there is no genocide in Gaza. Over 50 leading international law, genocide & military experts have rejected the claim. A false narrative pushed by a minority of loud voices falls apart under factual and legal scrutiny.
This list sharply counters the notion of a "consensus" agreeing there is genocide, which rests on a small set of voices—focused on Jewish names—who made the charge against ISRAEL only days after 10/7. Their arguments all rely on misquoting Israel leaders to "prove" intent.
For example, the distortion of President Herzog’s comments is among the most blatant lies in the “genocide” narrative. “Experts” who cite his words as evidence of genocidal intent reveal only their bias and intellectual dishonesty.
The “intentional starvation” claim is another backbone of every "expert" genocide accusation. Yet not one report or article pushing the genocide narrative honestly engages with the basic data shown below—because it would collapse their entire case.
The glaring weakness of the genocide charge is clear when its strongest advocates admit the law doesn’t fit. Amnesty called the definition “overly cramped,” and Ireland pushed to “broaden its interpretation.” Both seek to rewrite the law.
See links to sources. Note: certain titles, professorships, honors, military ranks, positions, etc. were often abbreviated, summarized or omitted to limit the text to one row, not to downplay or misrepresent credentials. Their expertise is evident.
(Aizenberg on X)
"A strong consensus has formed: there is no genocide in Gaza. Over 50 leading international law, genocide & military experts have rejected the claim. A false narrative pushed by a minority of loud voices falls apart under factual and legal scrutiny.
This list sharply counters the notion of a "consensus" agreeing there is genocide, which rests on a small set of voices—focused on Jewish names—who made the charge against ISRAEL only days after 10/7. Their arguments all rely on misquoting Israel leaders to "prove" intent.
For example, the distortion of President Herzog’s comments is among the most blatant lies in the “genocide” narrative. “Experts” who cite his words as evidence of genocidal intent reveal only their bias and intellectual dishonesty.
The “intentional starvation” claim is another backbone of every "expert" genocide accusation. Yet not one report or article pushing the genocide narrative honestly engages with the basic data shown below—because it would collapse their entire case.
The glaring weakness of the genocide charge is clear when its strongest advocates admit the law doesn’t fit. Amnesty called the definition “overly cramped,” and Ireland pushed to “broaden its interpretation.” Both seek to rewrite the law.
See links to sources. Note: certain titles, professorships, honors, military ranks, positions, etc. were often abbreviated, summarized or omitted to limit the text to one row, not to downplay or misrepresent credentials. Their expertise is evident.
(Aizenberg on X)
Page 1