Search Results
7/12/2025, 3:26:19 AM
>>510141394
There are a few things we must consider when we look at muslims.
First and foremost is the simple fact that without kikes there would be functionaly zero islam in the west. None. They were imported into the west by kikes.
The reason for this is simple. It accomplishes two things that benefit kikes. Firstly, it moves their neighboring enemies to the lands of their far away enemies. This divides and demoralises their far away enemies, which are undefeatable to kikes. As evidenced by 2500+ individual instances spread across 109 seperate nations throughout history. They always think they have won. And then the pogroms start. So they have learned that they must do all in their power to weaken amalek. Because they cannot defeat him until they drag him down to their level.
Secondly it allows them, using their media ownership, to paint islam as the worst enemy of the west.
This results in western European men (and their descendant nations) going to die in the middle east for no good reason. It allows kikes to play their perverted sick games of genocide and torture in their own country. "It's just muslims, they are evil and violent anyway, as evidenced by (insert popular media here)!"
Yes the muslim is an odious backwards creature. But, like niggers, it would be half a world away and unable to even interact with us without our wishes, were it not for the cliptip menace.
It is not a new tactic, for the kike is unimaginative and unable to invent new tactics. It's an ancient age old method of weakening a host nation that they have engaged in for thousands upon thousands of years.
If we killed all kikes islam would be a non issue. We could remove kebab. We could wipe their nations off the map. They would have no access to our technology. They would have not access to our weapons. It's an ideology that is incapable of innovation or invention. It's simply not a threat on it's own, in a vacuum.
There are a few things we must consider when we look at muslims.
First and foremost is the simple fact that without kikes there would be functionaly zero islam in the west. None. They were imported into the west by kikes.
The reason for this is simple. It accomplishes two things that benefit kikes. Firstly, it moves their neighboring enemies to the lands of their far away enemies. This divides and demoralises their far away enemies, which are undefeatable to kikes. As evidenced by 2500+ individual instances spread across 109 seperate nations throughout history. They always think they have won. And then the pogroms start. So they have learned that they must do all in their power to weaken amalek. Because they cannot defeat him until they drag him down to their level.
Secondly it allows them, using their media ownership, to paint islam as the worst enemy of the west.
This results in western European men (and their descendant nations) going to die in the middle east for no good reason. It allows kikes to play their perverted sick games of genocide and torture in their own country. "It's just muslims, they are evil and violent anyway, as evidenced by (insert popular media here)!"
Yes the muslim is an odious backwards creature. But, like niggers, it would be half a world away and unable to even interact with us without our wishes, were it not for the cliptip menace.
It is not a new tactic, for the kike is unimaginative and unable to invent new tactics. It's an ancient age old method of weakening a host nation that they have engaged in for thousands upon thousands of years.
If we killed all kikes islam would be a non issue. We could remove kebab. We could wipe their nations off the map. They would have no access to our technology. They would have not access to our weapons. It's an ideology that is incapable of innovation or invention. It's simply not a threat on it's own, in a vacuum.
Page 1