>>715680668
Not a legal fag but

>(1) IN GENERAL.—To provide fair access to financial services, a covered bank, including a subsidiary of a covered bank,
>shall, except as necessary to comply with another provision of law—
>(A) make each financial service the covered bank offers available to all persons in the geographic market served by the covered bank on proportionally equal terms;
>(B) not deny any person a financial service the covered bank offers unless the denial is justified by such quantified and documented failure of the person to meet quantitative,
>impartial risk-based standards established in advance by the covered bank;
>(C) not deny, in coordination with or at the request of others, any person a financial service the covered bank offers; and


>(D) when denying any person financial services the covered bank offers,
>provide written justification to the person explaining the basis for the denial,
>including any specific laws or regulations the covered bank believes are being violated by the person or customer.
D needs to be stronger. If they ***believe*** it's illegal they can deny the transaction.
If they truly believed it's illegal it should be turning them over to law enforcement, not refusing the transaction.
If law enforcement tells them to kick rocks it's not illegal and the transaction should go through.
D need to be stronger.

Does VISA fall under "BANK" or does it needs its own category?