Search Results
7/16/2025, 4:55:24 PM
Prolife but
>Won't help with housing
>Won't help with medical care
>Won't help with natal care
>Won't help with food security
It's just abortion with extra steps. Why call yourself prolife from "saving" a "baby's" life only to make it as difficult as possible for that "baby" to survive longterm anyway? As a matter of fact. Why are "pro-life" people for the death penalty with a chance that person can be innocent but will give no such leniency to a mother who lacks the resources necessary to care for a child at all? It's suffering for the sake of suffering.
>Won't help with housing
>Won't help with medical care
>Won't help with natal care
>Won't help with food security
It's just abortion with extra steps. Why call yourself prolife from "saving" a "baby's" life only to make it as difficult as possible for that "baby" to survive longterm anyway? As a matter of fact. Why are "pro-life" people for the death penalty with a chance that person can be innocent but will give no such leniency to a mother who lacks the resources necessary to care for a child at all? It's suffering for the sake of suffering.
6/26/2025, 11:54:46 AM
Page 1