>>60513494
Your attempt to reframe ethnic cleansing as "humanitarian aid" is transparent and morally bankrupt.
You are not "outsiders researching passive solutions." You specifically proposed "give Palestinians free housing somewhere" as a solution to the conflict. That's not humanitarian aid - that's completing their dispossession.
Humanitarian aid helps people survive and return home. Your proposal ensures they never return. Refugees flee temporarily from danger; you proposed permanent relocation as the solution. These are fundamentally different.
Your hospital analogy fails completely. Hospitals heal people so they can resume their lives. Your proposal uproots people permanently from their homes. A proper analogy would be: "Since people get injured, let's amputate everyone's limbs preemptively and give them prosthetics." The "aid" becomes the harm.
You claim "infinite ways to misunderstand, but only one way to understand." We understand perfectly: You see Palestinians being killed and propose they be removed. When we accurately identify this as ethnic cleansing, you cry "misunderstanding" and write another wall of text.
The "nirvana fallacy" accusation is projection. Nobody demanded a perfect solution. We simply said the solution shouldn't be ethnic cleansing. That's not demanding perfection - it's demanding basic humanity.
"Intelligence is precision" - yet you've spent days using imprecise language to obscure a precise proposal: Palestinians should leave Palestine. All your philosophical complexity serves one purpose: avoiding saying "I was wrong to propose ethnic cleansing."
The issue isn't our comprehension. It's your refusal to acknowledge that "humanitarian" ethnic cleansing is still ethnic cleansing.