>>510956857
>Proximity to niggers

In reality, the proximity of niggers is only a small factor, because niggers or not it would not fundamentally change anything

Because white "women" are distinguished by more masculine traits. They have square jaw, angular facial features, prominent brow ridges, more developed mastoid processes, combined with a more robust skeleton. They are also taller, larger, more odorous (unlike Asian women with the ABC11 gene) and their voices are often louder and more resonant, contrasting with the softness and delicacy of Asian women. They are closer to African women than we think. Their behavior is not the cause of some hook nosed Abrahamic entity, but just the reflection of their caveman biology.

If a white "woman" acting cute, it just doesn’t work, like a man wearing a wig, its cringe,as their genetics predispose them otherwise. Their bodies were simply not designed for this role. Fundamentally, they resemble men with female reproductive organs. Even surgical alterations can do little to change the underlying biology, leaving them as little more than modified men. unironically, the phrase "YWNBAW" could just as easily apply to white "women", whose traits deviate significantly from the feminine ideal. I'm using white "women" as an example but it applies to all non Asian women. Why don't you see any difference between white "women" and trannies these days? Well you have your answer but deep down you always knew it.

>>510750172
>It's the niggerification of the west.

In fact, negrification or not, it won't change anything.

Because white "women" are distinguished by more masculine traits. They have square jaw, angular facial features, prominent brow ridges, more developed mastoid processes, combined with a more robust skeleton. They are also taller, larger, more odorous (unlike Asian women with the ABC11 gene) and their voices are often louder and more resonant, contrasting with the softness and delicacy of Asian women. They are closer to African women than we think. Their behavior is not the cause of some hook nosed Abrahamic entity, but just the reflection of their caveman biology.

If a white "woman" acting cute, it just doesn’t work, like a man wearing a wig, its cringe,as their genetics predispose them otherwise. Their bodies were simply not designed for this role. Fundamentally, they resemble men with female reproductive organs. Even surgical alterations can do little to change the underlying biology, leaving them as little more than modified men. unironically, the phrase "YWNBAW" could just as easily apply to white "women", whose traits deviate significantly from the feminine ideal. I'm using white "women" as an example but it applies to all non Asian women. Why don't you see any difference between white "women" and trannies these days? Well you have your answer but deep down you always knew it.

>>510418363
So like every other woman throughout time? When they get into a relationship with an older man everything is hunky dory and people are jealous, but the moment another woman does it its wrong on some moral level?

>>510365344
>deliberately trying to act cutesy

In fact, they "don't try", they just are. And white "women", even if they try to be cute, will never be able to be.

Because white "women" are distinguished by more masculine traits. They have square jaw, angular facial features, prominent brow ridges, more developed mastoid processes, combined with a more robust skeleton. They are also taller, larger, more odorous (unlike Asian women with the ABC11 gene) and their voices are often louder and more resonant, contrasting with the softness and delicacy of Asian women. They are closer to African women than we think. Their behavior is not the cause of some hook nosed Abrahamic entity, but just the reflection of their caveman biology.

If a white "woman" acting cute, it just doesn’t work, like a man wearing a wig, its cringe,as their genetics predispose them otherwise. Their bodies were simply not designed for this role. Fundamentally, they resemble men with female reproductive organs. Even surgical alterations can do little to change the underlying biology, leaving them as little more than modified men. unironically, the phrase "YWNBAW" could just as easily apply to white "women", whose traits deviate significantly from the feminine ideal. I'm using white "women" as an example but it applies to all non Asian women. Why don't you see any difference between white "women" and trannies these days? Well you have your answer but deep down you always knew it.

>>510291104
>Feminism


In fact, feminism or not, it wouldn't change much.

Because white "women" are distinguished by more masculine traits. They have square jaw, angular facial features, prominent brow ridges, more developed mastoid processes, combined with a more robust skeleton. They are also taller, larger, more odorous (unlike Asian women with the ABC11 gene) and their voices are often louder and more resonant, contrasting with the softness and delicacy of Asian women. They are closer to African women than we think. Their behavior is not the cause of some hook nosed Abrahamic entity, but just the reflection of their caveman biology.

If a white "woman" acting cute, it just doesn’t work, like a man wearing a wig, its cringe,as their genetics predispose them otherwise. Their bodies were simply not designed for this role. Fundamentally, they resemble men with female reproductive organs. Even surgical alterations can do little to change the underlying biology, leaving them as little more than modified men. unironically, the phrase "YWNBAW" could just as easily apply to white "women", whose traits deviate significantly from the feminine ideal. I'm using white "women" as an example but it applies to all non Asian women. Why don't you see any difference between white "women" and trannies these days? Well you have your answer but deep down you always knew it.

>>509663526
>American culture.

Culture does indeed have an impact, a Westernized Asian woman would be just as much a whore, but a white "woman" will never be feminine in any case.

Because white "women" are distinguished by more masculine traits. They have square jaw, angular facial features, prominent brow ridges, more developed mastoid processes, combined with a more robust skeleton. They are also taller, larger, more odorous (unlike Asian women with the ABC11 gene) and their voices are often louder and more resonant, contrasting with the softness and delicacy of Asian women. They are closer to African women than we think. Their behavior is not the cause of some hook nosed Abrahamic entity, but just the reflection of their caveman biology.

If a white "woman" acting cute, it just doesn’t work, like a man wearing a wig, its cringe,as their genetics predispose them otherwise. Their bodies were simply not designed for this role. Fundamentally, they resemble men with female reproductive organs. Even surgical alterations can do little to change the underlying biology, leaving them as little more than modified men. unironically, the phrase "YWNBAW" could just as easily apply to white "women", whose traits deviate significantly from the feminine ideal. I'm using white "women" as an example but it applies to all non Asian women. Why don't you see any difference between white "women" and trannies these days? Well you have your answer but deep down you always knew it.

>>509524784
>Food

It's not about food

In fact, white "women" are distinguished by more masculine traits. They have square jaw, angular facial features, prominent brow ridges, more developed mastoid processes, combined with a more robust skeleton. They are also taller, larger, more odorous (unlike Asian women with the ABC11 gene) and their voices are often louder and more resonant, contrasting with the softness and delicacy of Asian women. They are closer to African women than we think. Their behavior is not the cause of some hook nosed Abrahamic entity, but just the reflection of their caveman biology.

If a white "woman" acting cute, it just doesn’t work, like a man wearing a wig, its cringe,as their genetics predispose them otherwise. Their bodies were simply not designed for this role. Fundamentally, they resemble men with female reproductive organs. Even surgical alterations can do little to change the underlying biology, leaving them as little more than modified men. unironically, the phrase "YWNBAW" could just as easily apply to white "women", whose traits deviate significantly from the feminine ideal. I'm using white "women" as an example but it applies to all non Asian women. Why don't you see any difference between white "women" and trannies these days? Well you have your answer but deep down you always knew it.

>>508721132
>mindbroken by jooz and niggz

Even without Jews and niggers wouldn't change much.

Because white "women" are distinguished by more masculine traits. They have square jaw, angular facial features, prominent brow ridges, more developed mastoid processes, combined with a more robust skeleton. They are also taller, larger, more odorous (unlike Asian women with the ABC11 gene) and their voices are often louder and more resonant, contrasting with the softness and delicacy of Asian women. They are closer to African women than we think. Their behavior is not the cause of some hook nosed Abrahamic entity, but just the reflection of their caveman biology.

If a white "woman" acting cute, it just doesn’t work, like a man wearing a wig, its cringe,as their genetics predispose them otherwise. Their bodies were simply not designed for this role. Fundamentally, they resemble men with female reproductive organs. Even surgical alterations can do little to change the underlying biology, leaving them as little more than modified men. unironically, the phrase "YWNBAW" could just as easily apply to white "women", whose traits deviate significantly from the feminine ideal. I'm using white "women" as an example but it applies to all non Asian women. Why don't you see any difference between white "women" and trannies these days? Well you have your answer but deep down you always knew it.

>>508496346
>cultural difference

Not really

In fact, its because white "women" are distinguished by more masculine traits. They have square jaw, angular facial features, prominent brow ridges, more developed mastoid processes, combined with a more robust skeleton. They are also taller, larger, more odorous (unlike Asian women with the ABC11 gene) and their voices are often louder and more resonant, contrasting with the softness and delicacy of Asian women. They are closer to African women than we think. Their behavior is not the cause of some hook nosed Abrahamic entity, but just the reflection of their caveman biology.

If a white "woman" acting cute, it just doesn’t work, like a man wearing a wig, its cringe,as their genetics predispose them otherwise. Their bodies were simply not designed for this role. Fundamentally, they resemble men with female reproductive organs. Even surgical alterations can do little to change the underlying biology, leaving them as little more than modified men. unironically, the phrase "YWNBAW" could just as easily apply to white "women", whose traits deviate significantly from the feminine ideal. I'm using white "women" as an example but it applies to all non Asian women. Why don't you see any difference between white "women" and trannies these days? Well you have your answer but deep down you always knew it.

>>507997253
OP is a seething white roastie who can't compete