Search Results
6/27/2025, 2:57:56 PM
>>529017820
>HAHAHHAHAH
God I'm fucking based. Anyway I'm just trying to get you to answer this very simple question.
>They claim that Wriothesley is not replaceable >>528999916
Was this anon trying to equate Wriothesleys damage contribution with Yelan when I openly asked for if they could clear that team without Yelan?
>Yes you two digit(s) IQ tranny, Wriothesley is not replaceable in a showcase of Wriothesley
Finally a breakthrough! this is good, because this is blatantly a false interpretation of what I asked. To begin with the premise by which you are presupposing this is that the team is a wriothesley team. Which fundamentally wasn't what I was mocking nor does it even address the core tenet of my argument.
You've quite eloquently shown how that poster was out of her depth. We are not evaluating the entire team as "Wriothesley" core but the significant damage distribution of YELAN to the wriothesley core. This was what my entire statement was about. Which she seemed to not be able to grasp.
She then realized that she had no evidence of what I was specifically asking about. Which was a team in which Wriothesley is paired with a 4* replacement for XQ, but could still clear. Obviously this parameter was not reached.
>>529018532
Wrong, there are other people making fun of the wrio yume who accuses others of samefagging, see >>529014545
>HAHAHHAHAH
God I'm fucking based. Anyway I'm just trying to get you to answer this very simple question.
>They claim that Wriothesley is not replaceable >>528999916
Was this anon trying to equate Wriothesleys damage contribution with Yelan when I openly asked for if they could clear that team without Yelan?
>Yes you two digit(s) IQ tranny, Wriothesley is not replaceable in a showcase of Wriothesley
Finally a breakthrough! this is good, because this is blatantly a false interpretation of what I asked. To begin with the premise by which you are presupposing this is that the team is a wriothesley team. Which fundamentally wasn't what I was mocking nor does it even address the core tenet of my argument.
You've quite eloquently shown how that poster was out of her depth. We are not evaluating the entire team as "Wriothesley" core but the significant damage distribution of YELAN to the wriothesley core. This was what my entire statement was about. Which she seemed to not be able to grasp.
She then realized that she had no evidence of what I was specifically asking about. Which was a team in which Wriothesley is paired with a 4* replacement for XQ, but could still clear. Obviously this parameter was not reached.
>>529018532
Wrong, there are other people making fun of the wrio yume who accuses others of samefagging, see >>529014545
6/27/2025, 10:46:59 AM
>>529001616
>>529001563
Once again this completely emotional, and ad hom, attack is expected.
Were it the case that wriothesley could clear this content without yelan or shenhe.
Why has she not posted the evidence? if it was possible to clear fearless with a 4* with wriothesley as your main carry.
Why has she not posted it yet?
The answer my friends is simple.
Because it is not possible.
If we look at every possible realistic for wriothesley sims with only his C1R1 in mind.
Without Yelan he CANNOT reach the threshold necessary to clear fearless.
If there is any counter evidence I submit it to the schizo woman currently melting down to provide it.
>>529001563
Once again this completely emotional, and ad hom, attack is expected.
Were it the case that wriothesley could clear this content without yelan or shenhe.
Why has she not posted the evidence? if it was possible to clear fearless with a 4* with wriothesley as your main carry.
Why has she not posted it yet?
The answer my friends is simple.
Because it is not possible.
If we look at every possible realistic for wriothesley sims with only his C1R1 in mind.
Without Yelan he CANNOT reach the threshold necessary to clear fearless.
If there is any counter evidence I submit it to the schizo woman currently melting down to provide it.
Page 1