Search Results
6/30/2025, 2:30:43 PM
>>17802001
>The rise of the Parliamentarians was one of the first victories for the low-church bourgeoisie. It was a coup against the ecclesiastical and aristocratic elite which had ruled in England for at least a thousand years. It wasn't about what the King had the right to do, it was simply negating that he had any such rights to begin with.
Britain (england and lowland scotland really) never had an ecclesiasiastical and aristocratic elite
It was always a relatively egalitarian and socially mobile kingdom reaching back into the 1100s at least but likely long before that
>The rise of the Parliamentarians was one of the first victories for the low-church bourgeoisie. It was a coup against the ecclesiastical and aristocratic elite which had ruled in England for at least a thousand years. It wasn't about what the King had the right to do, it was simply negating that he had any such rights to begin with.
Britain (england and lowland scotland really) never had an ecclesiasiastical and aristocratic elite
It was always a relatively egalitarian and socially mobile kingdom reaching back into the 1100s at least but likely long before that
Page 1