Search Results
6/22/2025, 7:51:55 AM
>>508291031
I think the problem is he has to justify it, was there a threat, a reason for the operation, really?
And congress is going to say there wasn't, Israel is going to say, "I think there was imminent danger." Trump will say, "Give me cummies Rabbi Bibi"
I think the problem is he has to justify it, was there a threat, a reason for the operation, really?
And congress is going to say there wasn't, Israel is going to say, "I think there was imminent danger." Trump will say, "Give me cummies Rabbi Bibi"
6/21/2025, 9:48:50 PM
>>508221383
Missile? That looked like a shahed drone, correct me if I'm wrong but those haven't been hitting and the proportions look off
I think op might be gay, and I think his video might be fake.
Missile? That looked like a shahed drone, correct me if I'm wrong but those haven't been hitting and the proportions look off
I think op might be gay, and I think his video might be fake.
6/21/2025, 4:35:42 AM
>>508153198
>disinformation
Is that like saying that Uranium only needs to be enriched above 60% if you're making weapons?
What about ship propulsion and space exploration? These are both areas the USA currently (or previously in the case of the cancelled space reactors initiative) enriches uranium above 90%. I'm sure there are others situations, but the fact is that Uranium does need to be enriched above 60% for reasons besides creating nuclear bombs.
>disinformation
Is that like saying that Uranium only needs to be enriched above 60% if you're making weapons?
What about ship propulsion and space exploration? These are both areas the USA currently (or previously in the case of the cancelled space reactors initiative) enriches uranium above 90%. I'm sure there are others situations, but the fact is that Uranium does need to be enriched above 60% for reasons besides creating nuclear bombs.
Page 1