>>105801252
in a decade- maybe
probably.
but now?
nah bro
>Feels a bit like someone in the late 80s complaining about how bad the available C compilers are compared to the ones that will be built decades later
thats exactly what i do
i need tools that give me certitudes
stuff i can rely on
my current stack is C/opencl C
even fukken valgrind cant follow because theres two devices talking, the gpu, and the pc proper (yes, these are actually two separate devices. gpu operations are opaque to the cpu because its basically another cpu with its own ram, but engineered for raw throughput)
my whole program is one big side effect
im rewriting a version from the ground up bc my skills improved, but once ill get going my header(s) alone will be more than 1000 lines long
an llm is utterly inadequate for this kinds of workloads
we need a paradigm shift before ai will be ripe for programming
because like i said
llms are an INTERFACE
an extremely powerful one,
to the extent it can somewhat program hello worlds
but thats the wrong direction
and the industry itself has discovered it
but the big players are blind to this simple truth
or maybe is it that the people who develop ai just dont want to make the final step bc then it will really be a wagiepocalypse
including themselves