Search Results
ID: CMpE55f7/pol/508273886#508277250
6/22/2025, 5:17:16 AM
>>508276066
Presidents don't really affect deficits as much as Congress because Congress has the power of the purse. Now look at things as Congressional party control and you'll get a different picture:
1989-1993: Democrat Congress--increased deficit
1994-2000: Republican Congress--decreased deficit
2001-2003: Democrats win 50 seats in the Senate. The deficit begins to increase again.
2004--2006: Republican Congress, decreased deficit
2007-2010: Democrat Congress, increased deficit
2010-2018: Republican Congress, decreased deficit
2018-2021: Democrat Congress, COVID, increased deficit
I should really just make a graphic of this so you retards can see it with little colors like how an IDE helps pajeets to understand the code they could never handle in notepad.
Presidents don't really affect deficits as much as Congress because Congress has the power of the purse. Now look at things as Congressional party control and you'll get a different picture:
1989-1993: Democrat Congress--increased deficit
1994-2000: Republican Congress--decreased deficit
2001-2003: Democrats win 50 seats in the Senate. The deficit begins to increase again.
2004--2006: Republican Congress, decreased deficit
2007-2010: Democrat Congress, increased deficit
2010-2018: Republican Congress, decreased deficit
2018-2021: Democrat Congress, COVID, increased deficit
I should really just make a graphic of this so you retards can see it with little colors like how an IDE helps pajeets to understand the code they could never handle in notepad.
Page 1