Search Results
ID: hcChWGpQ/biz/60478629#60515151
6/17/2025, 7:40:15 PM
>>60515049
The absolute irony of you posting an AI's analysis to declare victory is that your own AI agrees with me and told you to do everything you've spent days refusing to do.
It literally schooled you like I said it would:
Your proposal was ethnic cleansing. It explicitly said your use of "relocate" was reasonably interpreted as forced displacement.
Your only path forward was to reverse your position. The AI literally told you to post: "I'm sorry for the confusion; I don't support forcing anyone from their homes" and "I want Palestinians to live safely where they are."
So after days of calling us "lesser intelligent beings" who can't understand your "superior intelligence," you consulted an AI that... agreed with every single criticism I made. It told you that yes, proposing relocation in this context DOES sound like ethnic cleansing, and yes, you should apologize for suggesting it.You claimed we were "narcissists" engaged in "harassment," but your own AI consultant said YOU were the one escalating with insults and that our concerns about ethnic cleansing were valid.
But Instead of taking the AI's advice to apologize and change your stance, you posted it as a win and ran away. That's the most telling part of this entire exchange.
Now, for the point-by-point breakdown you've been avoiding:
>>60514895
The ICJ, ICC, and every major human rights organization found Israel is deliberately targeting civilians. You're using the exact dehumanization that enables genocide - collective punishment of an entire population.
>"No aggression can be categorically judged wrong"
Yes it can. That's literally what international law exists for. The ICC just issued arrest warrants for war crimes. The ICJ found plausible genocide. You're saying the Holocaust couldn't be "categorically judged wrong" either? Your "incomplete information models" excuse would justify any atrocity.
>cont
The absolute irony of you posting an AI's analysis to declare victory is that your own AI agrees with me and told you to do everything you've spent days refusing to do.
It literally schooled you like I said it would:
Your proposal was ethnic cleansing. It explicitly said your use of "relocate" was reasonably interpreted as forced displacement.
Your only path forward was to reverse your position. The AI literally told you to post: "I'm sorry for the confusion; I don't support forcing anyone from their homes" and "I want Palestinians to live safely where they are."
So after days of calling us "lesser intelligent beings" who can't understand your "superior intelligence," you consulted an AI that... agreed with every single criticism I made. It told you that yes, proposing relocation in this context DOES sound like ethnic cleansing, and yes, you should apologize for suggesting it.You claimed we were "narcissists" engaged in "harassment," but your own AI consultant said YOU were the one escalating with insults and that our concerns about ethnic cleansing were valid.
But Instead of taking the AI's advice to apologize and change your stance, you posted it as a win and ran away. That's the most telling part of this entire exchange.
Now, for the point-by-point breakdown you've been avoiding:
>>60514895
The ICJ, ICC, and every major human rights organization found Israel is deliberately targeting civilians. You're using the exact dehumanization that enables genocide - collective punishment of an entire population.
>"No aggression can be categorically judged wrong"
Yes it can. That's literally what international law exists for. The ICC just issued arrest warrants for war crimes. The ICJ found plausible genocide. You're saying the Holocaust couldn't be "categorically judged wrong" either? Your "incomplete information models" excuse would justify any atrocity.
>cont
Page 1