sorry, they can not simply invent a new interpretation of the communication intentions of mine even if this is convenient to their primitive self-inflating desires. while they may abuse my autistic straightforwardness in which i openly discuss moral dilemmas and controversial subjects in terms of hypotheticals (similar tactics were used by them to prevent me from deploying smart-contracts originally when i was a socially isolated victim, they are not creative at all), eventually their pseudo-rhetorical nonsense falls flat, besides exposing their own deep negative influence on collective intelligence and projection of flawed approach to problems and communication with subconscious off-loading of the systemic limitations of their erratic methods on me, as projection and narcissism are deeply intertwined if not identical. thus we may distinguish multiple epistemological archetypes: 1) exhaustive exploration of gestalt potentialities independently of a priori or consensus-derived truth values, e.g. as an autist i am transparently «thinking out loud», where selection of symbolic signals out of sparse competing clusters of conceptual coherence is emergent with self-evident open-endedness that precludes emittance of redundant semantic uncertainty boilerplate. this contrasts 2) the narcissist’s grandiose self-attribution of repackaged positions with inherent limited creative reach due to strong inappropriate reputational attachments and lack of intrinsic interests for originality. lastly my style is non-academic, but rather abstraction esotericism from self-incubated neurodivergence which i think should make it interesting, as ai is not yet a complete replacement to gestalt oracle or equivalent models distinguishing slop.