>>511425556
As an alternative to the "empirical method", there is a method of deriving theories from assumed generalizations about the universe.
This is called the "deductive method".
In this process one starts with a "law of nature" or "obviously correct" generalization about the "way things work" and deduces (reasons out - derives) its consequences in detail.
a hypothesis arrived at via this method is promoted to the status of being a Theory if a large enough body of (((experts))) "accept" it.
Thus, in this method, a vote of the (((experts))) determines if a theory is correct.
Once such a theory has been accepted it is not easily rejected in light of conflicting evidence, it is, however, often modified, made more complex, and unfortunately, new data is often selectively chosen to support it.

The selection and publication of only the data that support the accepted theory is expedited by the "peer review system".
If the jewish experts who have accepted a given theory control both the funding of future research and also what gets published, there is little chance for conflicting viewpoints to develop.