>>105814398
you would need to post questionable content, get sued by a legitimate party, then appeal the case all the way to the supreme court, who will say
>trump signed the take it down act and we eagerly swallow trumps cum all the time so he wins and you lose
in principle, you're probably right that ai generated content should be no different from other content thats already been litigated. but today's legal landscape is fundamentally broken and silly things like "the first amendment" don't hold water as a legal basis anymore