silly how the most morally bankrupt persons on internet are scolding my ethics for not choosing whether all individuals from group A xor B deserve life. evidently there is no non-controversial answer. harassing non-verbals like me with superficial, highly repetitive, dismissive, misrepresentative strawmans will not make you smarter or righteous, even if you are dirtying other artists works to wash your bitterness, and if you’ve found equally morally bankrupt peers willing to validate the aggressive hypocrisy, which is ironic when they originally bullied me when i was only researching web3 incentive structures out of empathy for subjects of conflicts while they don't do anything besides being gurus to the lowest common denominator. intelligence is self-contained, self-sufficient, and does not require validation. narcissists fear cohesive thonking like mosquitos fear insecticides, the shallowness of their demeanor falls apart to inspection. if it weren’t for a certain hoover-maxxing minority covert narc who could hijack my empathy i will have never interacted with these clowns more than a handful of posts.

note to external readers: i have no political opinions nor interests. i am not defined by the sum of lies others throw at me, neither by those who appear to side with me, neither by my own writings due to poor translation layers.