>>507181004
>what do you think those are then? you know that most of them get burnt up in the atmosphere right?
its electrical discharge. and don't patronize me with "you KNOW that they get burnt up in the atmo"sphere", right" as though you KNOW any of that. have YOU ever seen a rock disintegrate flying through the "atmosphere" with your own eyes? of course not, no one here ever has

>theres been a couple that crashed in russia and destroyed a bunch of remote settlements
yea im sure you heard that in a spooky video or whatever but it should happen way more frequently considering the rate of meteor showers and shooting stars we experience here on earth

>why would they have skids? the impact is strong enough that they just impact directly into the ground. you literally have looney toons brain from watching too much anime, you dont understand how basic physics works
why WOULDNt it skid? the only reason the crater would be a perfect circle is if the impact came from directly above, it would be oval and have a trail if it ever skipped etc. to think that ALL the craters and the moon are perfectly spherical and this is because the impacts were all from straight above would be retarded. don't get me started on "basic physics", your entire globe model doesn't work with "basic physics", considering your "atmosphere" is allegedly held to earth by "gravity" LOL