Search Results
7/20/2025, 1:08:52 PM
>Munich was never actually broken.
>>uh welll technically
>No it was literally never broken.
The Munich Agreement was a rubber stamp of approval by Britain and France on the German annexation of the Sudetenland, detailing the when and how it was to be done.
The British government and the British public felt betrayed after the German occupation of the rest of Czechoslovakia because Hitler had **publically promised** not to expand Germany after being given the Sudetenland. Those promises were the entire reason and the basis on which the Munich Agreement was made.
Speeches are not legally binding, but they are a very basic indicator of wheter or not you are trustworthy or reliable to be engaged with.
I can't believe this needs to be explained.
>>uh welll technically
>No it was literally never broken.
The Munich Agreement was a rubber stamp of approval by Britain and France on the German annexation of the Sudetenland, detailing the when and how it was to be done.
The British government and the British public felt betrayed after the German occupation of the rest of Czechoslovakia because Hitler had **publically promised** not to expand Germany after being given the Sudetenland. Those promises were the entire reason and the basis on which the Munich Agreement was made.
Speeches are not legally binding, but they are a very basic indicator of wheter or not you are trustworthy or reliable to be engaged with.
I can't believe this needs to be explained.
Page 1