>>510571333
the deadline for voting isn't even over retard
ofcourse there isn't an example that shows what the SKG initiative did to fix a game

it's an example from 2004 where companies still made games exactly like what we're asking for
showing that it is entirely possible, therefore any corpo shilling saying shit like:
>"oh no that is waaaay too hard"
>"that is not possibe!"
>"that is too expensive!"
>"that is not safe"
>"that is unreasonable!"
are complete bullshit

there it is
there's the game released in 2004
played online with dudes in 2025
no servers online hosted by epic
the games have been pulled from all digital stores years ago by epic
yet it's still there and it works, i'm shooting people in rankin over the internet with them