>>936729575
>weren't you supposed to head out last thread.

I was indeed. However fear not for the distraction came in the form of this post >>936728104 and my morbid curiosity. Thirty second increments suggest a recent ban. Which itself is interesting.

That said I can take the hint. Besides it does rather seem you have your hands, ahem, busy with a certain anon.

Here, have this as a parting present. I'll go grab lunch and trust you to ignore the incoherent ramblings of certain anons and be able to - what's the word....

Differentiate.

>The things I have saved in this mis. celeb folder that are of no interest to me in any way whatsoever is worthy of a post in and of itself.