Search Results
7/9/2025, 6:21:07 PM
>>81766968
>can I pull in america?
absolutely fucking not.
Not even fucking close.
maybe if youre
>tall
>fit muscular body
>handsome face
>funny and charming extrovert chad personality
>rich
of which you need at the minimum 3/5 on those traits, but otherwise you're not "pulling" anything. like not even mid-ugly foids.
I'm not even trying to be mean, but sexual dynamics in the west are so utterly fucked its beyond unbelievable, and sorry to say, but being Indian is kind of a debuff in this already rigged-as-fuck game.
>can I pull in america?
absolutely fucking not.
Not even fucking close.
maybe if youre
>tall
>fit muscular body
>handsome face
>funny and charming extrovert chad personality
>rich
of which you need at the minimum 3/5 on those traits, but otherwise you're not "pulling" anything. like not even mid-ugly foids.
I'm not even trying to be mean, but sexual dynamics in the west are so utterly fucked its beyond unbelievable, and sorry to say, but being Indian is kind of a debuff in this already rigged-as-fuck game.
7/9/2025, 2:53:43 AM
>>81760264
1) is she a virgin?
2) how old is she?
3) does she only want chad?
and why do I get the feeling that the answers to those questions will be: no, post-wall, and yes?
>successful and accomplished
oh right and
4) would she date someone that makes (significantly) less money than her or would even be a stay at home husband?
because for some reason all those "successfull and accomplished" women always still want a provider guy who is even more "successful and accomplished" than she is.
On the other hand, males, especially the successful and accomplished ones, literally do not give a damn about any of that shit. THEY do not have any particular desire that their GF has to be simmilarly accomplished and successful.
If they got the choice between an accomplished and successful career early 30's career woman and the cute early 20's barista from starbucks that always smiles when you order your coffee, men at large will just go for the barista. Her socioeconmic status doesn't really matter.
So like most women, they are only attracted to maybe 5% of the male population, while those men would gladly mate with ~50% of the female population, especially if he can with no strings attached.
How often do you think it happens that some career woman with a high paying six figure salary actually wants to pursue a serious relationship with the guy that packs her bags at fucking 7-eleven?
A tale as old as time, they are themselfes at best kinda mid, but all compete for the top few percent of guys and wonder why they cant lock him down.
>Instead of raising their standards to attract a high-value partner, men would lower their standarts to have more promiscuous sex. Instead of lowering their standards to attract a mate, women would raise their standards to avoid being decieved by men who seek short term mating. (Stone et al, 2007)
>They compete more fiercely and do so by catering to male mate preferences. Women permit more uncommited sex. (Schmitt, 2005) They signal promiscuity...
1) is she a virgin?
2) how old is she?
3) does she only want chad?
and why do I get the feeling that the answers to those questions will be: no, post-wall, and yes?
>successful and accomplished
oh right and
4) would she date someone that makes (significantly) less money than her or would even be a stay at home husband?
because for some reason all those "successfull and accomplished" women always still want a provider guy who is even more "successful and accomplished" than she is.
On the other hand, males, especially the successful and accomplished ones, literally do not give a damn about any of that shit. THEY do not have any particular desire that their GF has to be simmilarly accomplished and successful.
If they got the choice between an accomplished and successful career early 30's career woman and the cute early 20's barista from starbucks that always smiles when you order your coffee, men at large will just go for the barista. Her socioeconmic status doesn't really matter.
So like most women, they are only attracted to maybe 5% of the male population, while those men would gladly mate with ~50% of the female population, especially if he can with no strings attached.
How often do you think it happens that some career woman with a high paying six figure salary actually wants to pursue a serious relationship with the guy that packs her bags at fucking 7-eleven?
A tale as old as time, they are themselfes at best kinda mid, but all compete for the top few percent of guys and wonder why they cant lock him down.
>Instead of raising their standards to attract a high-value partner, men would lower their standarts to have more promiscuous sex. Instead of lowering their standards to attract a mate, women would raise their standards to avoid being decieved by men who seek short term mating. (Stone et al, 2007)
>They compete more fiercely and do so by catering to male mate preferences. Women permit more uncommited sex. (Schmitt, 2005) They signal promiscuity...
7/8/2025, 6:31:44 PM
>>81757122
pic related is such a good redpill on the topic.
gender dynamics in in the west are so unbelievably fucked, I have no idea if its even possible to fix it within the current 21st century western moral framework.
pic related is such a good redpill on the topic.
gender dynamics in in the west are so unbelievably fucked, I have no idea if its even possible to fix it within the current 21st century western moral framework.
Page 1