Search Results
7/17/2025, 4:04:55 PM
7/17/2025, 3:30:56 PM
>>63992054
>>63992890
Are these working as intended?
They don't seem to be very effective as the fire burns out really quickly and it seems to spit out a baseball-size amount of material whilst the rest of the flame is mostly for show which makes it a precision weapon that can't do much to entrenched positions or personnel unless you get a direct hit, but it you need to get a direct hit, why don't you just cut down on the weight and cost by using disposable AT instead?
I don't understand the benefit of briefly inconveniencing a machine gunner or killing a single random dude compared to the risks they are taking to do so.
>>63992890
Are these working as intended?
They don't seem to be very effective as the fire burns out really quickly and it seems to spit out a baseball-size amount of material whilst the rest of the flame is mostly for show which makes it a precision weapon that can't do much to entrenched positions or personnel unless you get a direct hit, but it you need to get a direct hit, why don't you just cut down on the weight and cost by using disposable AT instead?
I don't understand the benefit of briefly inconveniencing a machine gunner or killing a single random dude compared to the risks they are taking to do so.
Page 1