Search Results
6/21/2025, 4:49:49 AM
>>17780078
>hue
>>17780111
This Brazilian is so illiterate, that I literally know the Wikipedia article he used haha but he conveniently doesn't include it
>It is unclear as to when the Rigveda was first written down
And then, he uses this paragraph and uses chatgpt to enlarge the text
>The oldest surviving manuscripts have been discovered in Nepal and date to c.1040 CE
BUTTT
>The early attempts may have been unsuccessful given the Smriti rules that forbade the writing down the Vedas
therefore, the whole premise of this thread is retard and has turned into a racial resentment xiiter.... it's like dilating like a bitch because you don't find "ancient" Rigveda writings when the essence of these myths were intrinsic to the cultural aspects, and were restricted to orality. he ironically, shows himself to be a retard again for not even reading the garbage he copied and pasted from wikicope
another thing I noticed this insect does is this part
>hue Even if you are a Nordicist hue who believes the oral tradition race hue war that it happened 1500-1200 BCE is true huee
besides practicing a blatant false premise here, using ad hominem and a flawed syllogism, he again didn't even read the author himself who he based on to support his thread,see how Witzel ironically supports the thesis of a "Nordicist" oral tradition from 1500
>The Vedic texts were orally composed and transmitted, without the use of script, in an unbroken line of transmission from teacher to student that was formalized early on. This ensured an impeccable textual transmission superior to the classical texts of other cultures; it is, in fact, something like a tape-recording of ca. 1500–500 BCE
Our jungle wizard friend has two choices
1. Oral tradition from 1500 is Nordicism, therefore, it is invalid
2. If the oral tradition from 1500 is a Nordicist concept, then everyone who postulates it is necessarily wrong, and if this is the case, Witzel is equally wrong, since he uses Nordicist concepts.
>hue
>>17780111
This Brazilian is so illiterate, that I literally know the Wikipedia article he used haha but he conveniently doesn't include it
>It is unclear as to when the Rigveda was first written down
And then, he uses this paragraph and uses chatgpt to enlarge the text
>The oldest surviving manuscripts have been discovered in Nepal and date to c.1040 CE
BUTTT
>The early attempts may have been unsuccessful given the Smriti rules that forbade the writing down the Vedas
therefore, the whole premise of this thread is retard and has turned into a racial resentment xiiter.... it's like dilating like a bitch because you don't find "ancient" Rigveda writings when the essence of these myths were intrinsic to the cultural aspects, and were restricted to orality. he ironically, shows himself to be a retard again for not even reading the garbage he copied and pasted from wikicope
another thing I noticed this insect does is this part
>hue Even if you are a Nordicist hue who believes the oral tradition race hue war that it happened 1500-1200 BCE is true huee
besides practicing a blatant false premise here, using ad hominem and a flawed syllogism, he again didn't even read the author himself who he based on to support his thread,see how Witzel ironically supports the thesis of a "Nordicist" oral tradition from 1500
>The Vedic texts were orally composed and transmitted, without the use of script, in an unbroken line of transmission from teacher to student that was formalized early on. This ensured an impeccable textual transmission superior to the classical texts of other cultures; it is, in fact, something like a tape-recording of ca. 1500–500 BCE
Our jungle wizard friend has two choices
1. Oral tradition from 1500 is Nordicism, therefore, it is invalid
2. If the oral tradition from 1500 is a Nordicist concept, then everyone who postulates it is necessarily wrong, and if this is the case, Witzel is equally wrong, since he uses Nordicist concepts.
Page 1