Search Results
7/9/2025, 5:40:46 PM
>>509920385
People think that I'm asking for women to "settle" for a chuddie.... becase it appears that I say that women have "high standards".
But no!
All I'm saying is that women are like animals, they do not perceive objective reality the way men do. They will 'always' go for the top 5% choice for whatever it is the available pool of men at their disposal. It's not a good or a bad thing, it's just their biology.
While men's score on women is a perfect normal distribution curve (an almost mathematically perfect) women score curve is skewed and compressed so that almost 90% men score under 3.
It literally DOESN'T MATTER how good a man is... women always prefer the top 5% someone out there that's not you (statistically speaking) This worked well when pool of men was a few dozen local men. As men got picked, pool of men shrunk, so eventually.... even a chuddie would become a top 5% if he worked hard.
But today? The pool of men isthe entire city. There's always a better man. It's the hummingbird effect, can't stay in one place, they need to jump from benis to benis, a never ending benis carousel.
By the time they reach critical age (30... 35) it's already too late. They're so broken and used up by the smash and dump crowd... a self respecting man has a hard time stomaching her condition and STILL she's thinking she stooped down to HIS level, for giving up her chad dream... that top 5% fuzzy cloud of available suitors, that can never put a ring on it because there's mathematically not enough time to stop fucking, the supply of pussy is just too big for chads.
People think that I'm asking for women to "settle" for a chuddie.... becase it appears that I say that women have "high standards".
But no!
All I'm saying is that women are like animals, they do not perceive objective reality the way men do. They will 'always' go for the top 5% choice for whatever it is the available pool of men at their disposal. It's not a good or a bad thing, it's just their biology.
While men's score on women is a perfect normal distribution curve (an almost mathematically perfect) women score curve is skewed and compressed so that almost 90% men score under 3.
It literally DOESN'T MATTER how good a man is... women always prefer the top 5% someone out there that's not you (statistically speaking) This worked well when pool of men was a few dozen local men. As men got picked, pool of men shrunk, so eventually.... even a chuddie would become a top 5% if he worked hard.
But today? The pool of men isthe entire city. There's always a better man. It's the hummingbird effect, can't stay in one place, they need to jump from benis to benis, a never ending benis carousel.
By the time they reach critical age (30... 35) it's already too late. They're so broken and used up by the smash and dump crowd... a self respecting man has a hard time stomaching her condition and STILL she's thinking she stooped down to HIS level, for giving up her chad dream... that top 5% fuzzy cloud of available suitors, that can never put a ring on it because there's mathematically not enough time to stop fucking, the supply of pussy is just too big for chads.
6/26/2025, 4:09:37 PM
>>508786599
Men scoring of women is a perfect normal distribution. The epitome of objectivism.
A 5/10 man is more than happy with a 5/10 female, in real score values.
But 5/10 women settle for nothing less than 8.5/10. And she will continue to ride that cock carousel until she's 38, and it's dawning on her that top 1% of men can't possibly put a ring on 99% of women. It's mathematically impossible
Men scoring of women is a perfect normal distribution. The epitome of objectivism.
A 5/10 man is more than happy with a 5/10 female, in real score values.
But 5/10 women settle for nothing less than 8.5/10. And she will continue to ride that cock carousel until she's 38, and it's dawning on her that top 1% of men can't possibly put a ring on 99% of women. It's mathematically impossible
Page 1