>>512279788
>pic rel is you
I spoke directly to your point. You've yet to define the supposed efficiency or inefficiency. You won't even reply to this specific point. What the efficiency or inefficiency consists of or is measured in.
Mind you, before you speak about efficiency, you should take a minute to think how Sweden would fare if, for some reason, it could no longer import anything more. Contemplate the efficiency or inefficiency in that situation. Or did you have breakfast this morning?