Search Results
6/17/2025, 10:40:34 PM
>>507769924
>They all worship the same god though, factually, all of saulstianity, islam and judaism worship the jewish god. They disagree on details but they all worship the same jewish myth, just with their own spin on it and interpretation. It's not "religion" that's inherently destructive, it's jewish ideas. Whether it's egalitarian-saulstian ideas, or egalitarian-commie ideas, it's all jewish ideas.
They're part of the same hoax and most likely Islam was meant to oppose Christianity so they would fight forever.
But it is fundamentally about religion if your book essentially says nonbelievers should be conquered, such as polytheists. That creates military conflict.
>They all worship the same god though, factually, all of saulstianity, islam and judaism worship the jewish god. They disagree on details but they all worship the same jewish myth, just with their own spin on it and interpretation. It's not "religion" that's inherently destructive, it's jewish ideas. Whether it's egalitarian-saulstian ideas, or egalitarian-commie ideas, it's all jewish ideas.
They're part of the same hoax and most likely Islam was meant to oppose Christianity so they would fight forever.
But it is fundamentally about religion if your book essentially says nonbelievers should be conquered, such as polytheists. That creates military conflict.
6/15/2025, 8:57:13 AM
>>507443052
>Religious belief represents the intellectual middle ground—the midwit state where humans are smart enough to ask profound questions about existence but not sophisticated enough to accept uncertainty or pursue rigorous empirical answers.
Uh huh, uh huh, smart people do a lot of reading, pondering, and discussing the nature of things until you see magic in front of your face. Then it seems pretty damn pedestrian to theorize.
>Religious belief represents the intellectual middle ground—the midwit state where humans are smart enough to ask profound questions about existence but not sophisticated enough to accept uncertainty or pursue rigorous empirical answers.
Uh huh, uh huh, smart people do a lot of reading, pondering, and discussing the nature of things until you see magic in front of your face. Then it seems pretty damn pedestrian to theorize.
Page 1