>>458433
>I HAVE DEVOTED MY LIFE TO THAT SKILL....WHY WONT THE GOVERNMENT DO SOMETHING???
weird understanding of politics.
if enough people are affected, then mass unemployment or poverty can lead to all kinds of societal disruptions - criminality and civil disorder, for example. but it also affects wages over all - even in unrelated domains. this obviously is a collective problem, not just an individual one. what about people who simply aren't able to adapt quickly enough anymore? it is delusional to assume they all simply "refuse to".

I am not suggesting that civil war *will* be the case, nor am I suggesting the government having to ban AI (or similar).
I simply pointed out, that lots of people will be losing their jobs AND that society at large will adapt. yet it is still important to emphasize that it is a fair (and even necessary) societal regulation mechanism for victims of such trends to be vocal about comparable unhappiness.

assuming that a government has no incentives for increasing (as well as securing) welfare and social justice/mobility seems like a hugely uneducated take. either you are trying to violently simplify in order not to deal with some more annoying details or your take is particularly pedestrian, I fear.

>>458436
yea, I largely agree.