>>509332609
Okay, that's nice. I just don't do faggot ass predictions like some simp cheerleader. I do realistic and pragmatic assessments.
>>509332765
>they enriched uranium far past what is needed for civilian
That's fine by me. Like I said, I'd love for Iran to have a nuke, if nukes are real. That would create a balance of power in the region that I'm more than happy with. However, every credible intelligence assessment has concluded that they're just not building a nuke.
Now, if they did, I would be more than happy with that.
>those of us who are actually vigilant about the MIC.
You're not vigilant about shit. You're simping for the MIC and you don't even know it. kek
>your dishonesty is a clear obstacle to the vigilance
I'm being realistic here. You're promoting the propaganda of the MIC that has been filtered through a MAGA screen