>>510489624
The female "Lunar" strategy, emerging at the dawn of the agrarian age, is embodied most clearly in the hypothesized “Old European” cultures of the Neolithic period, center on covert social control, consensus-based organization, emotional cohesion, and a high degree of female sexual selection. Its mode of power operates through shame, gossip, moral signaling, and control over access to reproduction and resources via social consensus. It tends toward egalitarian, low-conflict societies that optimize for stability and survival rather than expansion or innovation. In evolutionary terms, it can be stable and self-reinforcing as long as there is ample access to food (aka agriculture)—but this comes at the cost of long-term adaptability, vigor, resilience and technological dynamism.

In contrast, the masculine "Solar" strategy is what we will call that which emerged from the Indo-European, Greco-Roman, and later Western cultures. It is overtly hierarchical, patriarchal, and expansionist, characterized by law, warfare, transcendental order, and long-term orientation. It prioritizes structure, discipline, and legacy—often expressed through state-building, military conquest, and technological advancement. This strategy sacrifices short-term consensus for long-term complexity and scalability, enabling high-energy civilizations capable of transformation and resilience under stress. It is also deeply reproductive in its imperatives, aligning social structure with the goal of generational continuity. It emerged from the now-Ukrainian steppe as an environmental adaptation to pastoral living, in contrast to the neolithic agrarian "luna(r)-tics".