Search Results
ID: RfXHVyau/pol/510528784#510528784
7/16/2025, 1:40:39 PM
Since copyright laws are non-existent in mother Russia, Putin should acquire every movie/tv show in existence and stream it on Blyatflix for a reasonable cost (say a dollar or two for a month).
It would probably generate 1B+ from US alone.
>But anon, movie piracy sites already exist?
They're highly unreliable, get shut down after two years, the library isn't huge and the video quality is inconsistent. That's why modern streaming services are more popular, you can't convince goycattle to switch to a less convenient service to save shekels.
But they'll happily switch to a cheaper and bigger Netflix without much persuasion. Which is why Blyatflix is a fantastic idea.
It would probably generate 1B+ from US alone.
>But anon, movie piracy sites already exist?
They're highly unreliable, get shut down after two years, the library isn't huge and the video quality is inconsistent. That's why modern streaming services are more popular, you can't convince goycattle to switch to a less convenient service to save shekels.
But they'll happily switch to a cheaper and bigger Netflix without much persuasion. Which is why Blyatflix is a fantastic idea.
7/8/2025, 8:12:32 PM
Since copyright laws are non-existent in mother Russia, Putin should acquire every movie/tv show in existence and stream it on Blyatflix for a reasonable cost (say a dollar or two for a month).
It would probably generate 1B+ from US alone.
>But anon, movie piracy sites already exist?
They're highly unreliable, get shut down after two years, the library isn't huge and the video quality is inconsistent. That's why modern streaming services are more popular, you can't convince goycattle to switch to a less convenient service to save shekels.
But they'll happily switch to a cheaper and bigger Netflix without much persuasion. Which is why Blyatflix is a fantastic idea.
It would probably generate 1B+ from US alone.
>But anon, movie piracy sites already exist?
They're highly unreliable, get shut down after two years, the library isn't huge and the video quality is inconsistent. That's why modern streaming services are more popular, you can't convince goycattle to switch to a less convenient service to save shekels.
But they'll happily switch to a cheaper and bigger Netflix without much persuasion. Which is why Blyatflix is a fantastic idea.
6/19/2025, 6:29:14 PM
>>24479172
>Two more weeks
The trendline of the war is obvious, undeniable and irreversible
In 2024 and the first half of 2025 Russia captured 4,168 square km of land and 1,935 square km, respectively. In total, around 6,000 square km, or around twenty-three (23!) times more territory than Ukraine’s disastrous failed 2023 counter-offensive captured (253 square km) that was supposed to turn the war in Ukraine’s failure, and which will live forever in infamy in history books as a colossal and ruinous failure.
In 2024 and 2025 the Russians also:
>captured fortress cities like Avdiivka, Toretsk and Vuhledar
>rolled up the entire AFU defense line in SE-Donbass
>Kicked the Ukrainians out of Kursk while inflicting massive casualties the whole
time by having drone control of the only roads in/out Kursk
>Established a massive bridgehead over the river north of Kupyansk and connected it by road to Russia
>Broke through the AFU defenses in between Pokrovsk and Kostantynovka and are pushing deep into Ukrainian rear areas.
>Right now the Russians are conducting an unstoppable advance towards Sumy that the AFU has been helpless in the face of, Sumy itself being a short drive from Kiev
Meanwhile:
>USA has ended all aid, Europe has no cheap energy to make more shells and weapons
>The AFU is facing increasing resistance to its forced recruitment and there is a rise in attacks on and bombing of mobilizers
>The AFU is catastrophically short of men and is outnumbered by 10 to 1 on some areas of the front
>China is cutting off drone supply to Ukraine but not Russia, reducing Ukraine’s drones
Ukraine and the AFU is a walking corpse right now, just waiting for the final blow that leads to a collapse and puts it out of misery. When is the last time they even recaptured a village due to a counterattack? At the beginning of the year?
>Two more weeks
The trendline of the war is obvious, undeniable and irreversible
In 2024 and the first half of 2025 Russia captured 4,168 square km of land and 1,935 square km, respectively. In total, around 6,000 square km, or around twenty-three (23!) times more territory than Ukraine’s disastrous failed 2023 counter-offensive captured (253 square km) that was supposed to turn the war in Ukraine’s failure, and which will live forever in infamy in history books as a colossal and ruinous failure.
In 2024 and 2025 the Russians also:
>captured fortress cities like Avdiivka, Toretsk and Vuhledar
>rolled up the entire AFU defense line in SE-Donbass
>Kicked the Ukrainians out of Kursk while inflicting massive casualties the whole
time by having drone control of the only roads in/out Kursk
>Established a massive bridgehead over the river north of Kupyansk and connected it by road to Russia
>Broke through the AFU defenses in between Pokrovsk and Kostantynovka and are pushing deep into Ukrainian rear areas.
>Right now the Russians are conducting an unstoppable advance towards Sumy that the AFU has been helpless in the face of, Sumy itself being a short drive from Kiev
Meanwhile:
>USA has ended all aid, Europe has no cheap energy to make more shells and weapons
>The AFU is facing increasing resistance to its forced recruitment and there is a rise in attacks on and bombing of mobilizers
>The AFU is catastrophically short of men and is outnumbered by 10 to 1 on some areas of the front
>China is cutting off drone supply to Ukraine but not Russia, reducing Ukraine’s drones
Ukraine and the AFU is a walking corpse right now, just waiting for the final blow that leads to a collapse and puts it out of misery. When is the last time they even recaptured a village due to a counterattack? At the beginning of the year?
6/19/2025, 12:10:28 AM
Page 1