Search Results
7/8/2025, 1:24:13 AM
>>40677804
I just want to point out something.
It's very obvious that the cornucopia in that image was added in later by a different artist. Anyone with experience in illustration or visual design could tell you this.
The linework on the fruit is very even - one line thickness for outlines, and a thinner line weight for the shading. All the shading on the fruit and veg is done with horizontal, evenly spaced stripes, even for curved surfaces. It's a very consistent and purposeful style. Perfect for both print and machine embroidery.
On the other hand, the line weights on the cornucopia is all over the place. Not only are the lines much thicker than the lines used on the fruit, they're also not even at all. The shading on the inside of the horn is done by making the colour darker, instead of the horizontal line shading used on the fruit. That means the one with the horn has 6 additional colours instead of just 1 additional colour, and unlike print, every additional colour on a machine embroidered logo increases the costs, so . And the detailing on the outside of the horn is messy and hand drawn instead of the clean smooth lines on the detailing on the leaves.
An artist simply would not have changed their style halfway through a piece like this, especially not for paid work. The cornucopia is simply not made by the same artist. I get that this is obviously supposed to be a recreation of the logo people claim to remember, rather than a proof of the original. But I've actually seen pictures of that logo with the cornucopia on the labels (though not on the tags) and it's always this exact image, with the uneven line weight and colour shading, rather than a variant where the cornucopia matches the style of the fruit. So someone is making fake Fruit of the Loom shit with the funny meme logo.
I just want to point out something.
It's very obvious that the cornucopia in that image was added in later by a different artist. Anyone with experience in illustration or visual design could tell you this.
The linework on the fruit is very even - one line thickness for outlines, and a thinner line weight for the shading. All the shading on the fruit and veg is done with horizontal, evenly spaced stripes, even for curved surfaces. It's a very consistent and purposeful style. Perfect for both print and machine embroidery.
On the other hand, the line weights on the cornucopia is all over the place. Not only are the lines much thicker than the lines used on the fruit, they're also not even at all. The shading on the inside of the horn is done by making the colour darker, instead of the horizontal line shading used on the fruit. That means the one with the horn has 6 additional colours instead of just 1 additional colour, and unlike print, every additional colour on a machine embroidered logo increases the costs, so . And the detailing on the outside of the horn is messy and hand drawn instead of the clean smooth lines on the detailing on the leaves.
An artist simply would not have changed their style halfway through a piece like this, especially not for paid work. The cornucopia is simply not made by the same artist. I get that this is obviously supposed to be a recreation of the logo people claim to remember, rather than a proof of the original. But I've actually seen pictures of that logo with the cornucopia on the labels (though not on the tags) and it's always this exact image, with the uneven line weight and colour shading, rather than a variant where the cornucopia matches the style of the fruit. So someone is making fake Fruit of the Loom shit with the funny meme logo.
Page 1