>>60695017
xXir, if your argument devolves to:
>if we just obsolete humanity as we know it, my idea would work
I would kindly ask you to redeem the idea by actually obsoleting humanity in any meaningful form first, not automatons which fundamentally cannot think as you gave in your example. You cannot empirically calculate a Human being in totality as far I'm aware, calculate a human, on and then talk about your ideology.
>Ie. Prove you can become a god first and then tell us all you want about it
>Muh algorithms can collapse the economy AFTER calculating a part of it.
The fact that your algorithms can predict with barely any accuracy at all is scarcely an achievement, as it has been done before by simply manufacturing a palace economy, it's all fake and gay, collapsing every time it has ever been tried of course. The process which you emulate on paper and call an achievement bar the collapse part.
Your entire premise is at best, an interesting quirk for a supposed god race, at worst the complete and utter destruction of humanity by a cult of Excel worshiping lunatics who with all respect should be institutionalized and always be on meds.

>>105651867
Can it technically run, or would it crash? Time isn't an issue and the computer case is AC cooled
>>105652160
If you love Claude so much, why don't you marry her?