Search Results
7/2/2025, 4:50:47 AM
Shitty argument, and utterly oblivious to nuance. There are 2 easy ways to address this.
1. Jews operate in a very in group manner. Much like freemasons, there's something of an outer visible shell and in inner version that's only seen to those who are a part of it, you are not included. Look no further than something like no payment of interest if you are a jew.
2. Jews are not omniscient. Intelligence is not omniscience.
I would posit that your implication of this is actually an insight into your very OWN stupidity, and perhaps a projection of it, because in any other case I think you would be able to conceive of the possibility of some other way of looking at it, wherin jews still could weild influence. It's a rather unserious way of analysing the issue that really only engages with low hanging fruit, and (please correct me if I'm wrong because I don't like assuming ill will and I apologize if I have) a concern for the discussion that is divided from a persuit of the truth (any easy mistake to make today to be honest because discourse is a joke).
1. Jews operate in a very in group manner. Much like freemasons, there's something of an outer visible shell and in inner version that's only seen to those who are a part of it, you are not included. Look no further than something like no payment of interest if you are a jew.
2. Jews are not omniscient. Intelligence is not omniscience.
I would posit that your implication of this is actually an insight into your very OWN stupidity, and perhaps a projection of it, because in any other case I think you would be able to conceive of the possibility of some other way of looking at it, wherin jews still could weild influence. It's a rather unserious way of analysing the issue that really only engages with low hanging fruit, and (please correct me if I'm wrong because I don't like assuming ill will and I apologize if I have) a concern for the discussion that is divided from a persuit of the truth (any easy mistake to make today to be honest because discourse is a joke).
7/1/2025, 10:23:53 AM
ID: 1re+Lb4R/pol/509187569#509187569
7/1/2025, 6:10:48 AM
6/30/2025, 10:54:48 PM
>>101788272
I don't like internet leaking into real world
I don't like internet leaking into real world
6/17/2025, 12:22:18 AM
>>28461627
>have mildly entertaining schtick of Reddit English Lit Undergrand Makes Up Elaborate Sociohistorical Context For Some Random Car
>internet success!
>start ruining every video with FIVE STRAIGHT MINUTES OF LOLSOFUNNY VOICES FAAAART JOOOKESSS
>inexplicably viewer numbers start dropping
>gotta turn this thing around
>genius inspiration!
>all new videos are Here's Fifteen Excruciating Minutes About My Disgusting Toasterfucker Fetishes And Also Maybe A Car Or Something
>RIP
Mr. Regular's self-destruction is a really good example for the argument that homosexuality is just sexualized narcissism. All he had to do was keep making mildly funny video essays overthinking a not very special consumer product's place in cultural history. But he had to make it about himself personally, and it turns out he's a revolting degenerate.
>have mildly entertaining schtick of Reddit English Lit Undergrand Makes Up Elaborate Sociohistorical Context For Some Random Car
>internet success!
>start ruining every video with FIVE STRAIGHT MINUTES OF LOLSOFUNNY VOICES FAAAART JOOOKESSS
>inexplicably viewer numbers start dropping
>gotta turn this thing around
>genius inspiration!
>all new videos are Here's Fifteen Excruciating Minutes About My Disgusting Toasterfucker Fetishes And Also Maybe A Car Or Something
>RIP
Mr. Regular's self-destruction is a really good example for the argument that homosexuality is just sexualized narcissism. All he had to do was keep making mildly funny video essays overthinking a not very special consumer product's place in cultural history. But he had to make it about himself personally, and it turns out he's a revolting degenerate.
Page 1