>>81803036
I'm bored so here's an answer from a leftist instead of a /pol/ chud.

What you consider being "sexually unsuccessful" is just women applying Capitalism to mating behaviors. When social mobility and economic mobility are only available through marrying up, then obviously women are going to minmax and select for the wealthiest most successful partner that can give them the wealthiest most successful offspring. You see this in 3rd world countries a lot: Men with a lot of resources will have a monopoly on the women, and as resources become more centralized and stratified so do the women. If you took this image and replaced "Wealth" with "Women" it would pretty much be identical. The only solution then, is to eliminate the wealth gap from society to even the playing field. ie, socialism. As people are no longer filtering potential partners through their "potential" income, they will be forced to look at other factors such as personality. Hell, if women simply weren't required to marry a rich man to have a happy life due to the competitive nature of Capitalism, they'd probably be more willing to settle for you.

Ultimately I don't think state-mandated sex redistribution is necessary because almost the entirety of it is solved by simply eliminating the wealth gap and giving women more agency to not be dependent on a husband for income. The Soviet Union never had an incel problem.