Search Results
6/23/2025, 7:59:11 PM
>>105681737
Like most things, it's nuanced.
There's a need for confidential / locked down, served models with better TOS than "trust us bro" stuff like ChatGPT and OAI's off the shelf API. Pic related. These I expect are going to be big money makers for these two companies, and expensive.
For what anons are using it for (coding, RP/chat) DS is just a cost effective solution, and idgaf about the privacy angle. Neither does a public company running 100,000 LLM chats / month for their customer service chat on website... this sort of work is really what makes the volume on these services, not our ah ah mistress slop.
If "US Officials" want to make the point that your IC sent to an LLM is not protected in China... sure. But let's be real; same "US Officials" encouragaged the mass tranport of IC to China in the first place, in the form of manufacturing, over 30 years ago. If they didn't want to enable China they shouldn't have let them into the WTO in the first place.
Like most things, it's nuanced.
There's a need for confidential / locked down, served models with better TOS than "trust us bro" stuff like ChatGPT and OAI's off the shelf API. Pic related. These I expect are going to be big money makers for these two companies, and expensive.
For what anons are using it for (coding, RP/chat) DS is just a cost effective solution, and idgaf about the privacy angle. Neither does a public company running 100,000 LLM chats / month for their customer service chat on website... this sort of work is really what makes the volume on these services, not our ah ah mistress slop.
If "US Officials" want to make the point that your IC sent to an LLM is not protected in China... sure. But let's be real; same "US Officials" encouragaged the mass tranport of IC to China in the first place, in the form of manufacturing, over 30 years ago. If they didn't want to enable China they shouldn't have let them into the WTO in the first place.
Page 1