>Both Matthew and Luke trace Jesus's ancestry directly to David the King of the Jews.
>G-g-god was wrong you guys. That's an error. Nick said it isn't true.

Anyone who has read the Bible in its totality knows that the New refers to verses in the Old Testament multiple times over. The New makes little sense without the Old. They don't exist separately. Which really is no surprise as early Christianity was a messianic Jewish sect. One of many (the Dead Sea Scrolls depict another) We know from Christianity's first century in the Roman world that nearly all its activity happened in the vicinity of synagogues. That is not a coincidence. It would be a statistical impossibility. I.e. first century Christianity hadn't yet detached itself from Judaism but existed as a branch of it and therefore centered around synagogues.

Christianity is not a departure from Judaism but its inner evolution. A dialogue with and progression from the Torah. Christianity is messianic Judaism. And messianic Judaism remains Judaism. Christianity is Judaism. Europe is a Christian civilization. Europe is a Jewish civilization. It's the victory of the Jew over the Pagan Rome. You could destroy the temple of the Jew but not the force of his beliefs and moral arguments. If you cannot understand and accept the reality of your own European past, that the European civilization is a Jewish civilization, no wonder you will suffer from an inferiority complex and project it on the Jew, your civilizational Father.