>>33227565
>Textbook damage control disguised as wisdom. kek
>Trying to reframe manipulation as charm, pretending your deflections and dismissive quips are just “lighthearted” tactics to keep things calm.
>This is gaslighting btw, people. He's making it seem like he’s the reasonable one while subtly dodging accountability
Nope.
See:
>>33227549
>I could literally just post snippets from random podcasts and you would dissect how it's blah blah
Pic related.

It literally doesn't matter what I post, you'll respond the same way no matter what. You're not thinking, you're regurgitating a fixed opinion and claiming it is clever dismantling of whatever I post, no matter what I say. It's pathetic and obvious.

Here:
>>33227555
>attacking the critic instead of the argument.
Claiming someone is avoiding an unmentioned argument is a type of fallacy, often referred to as avoiding the issue or red herring, where the person doesn't directly address the main point of the discussion and instead shifts the focus to something else. This tactic can be used to deflect, distract, or avoid engaging with a difficult topic.
Go.
Let me guess? Manipulative? Evasive? Maybe narcissistic? Hit me with another serving of your standard word salad.