Search Results
7/8/2025, 9:16:21 PM
inequality is the natural state and therefore inevitable; true equality only exists in mathematics and i have no issue with the existence of elites
illegitimate elitism is the problem. those who understand noblesse oblige understand that workers need to be productive and loyal, and that loyalty is a two way street.
the supposed bigger issue here is the managerial revolution. they had both ownership and control, and their traditional power centers were the business owner-operator, the middle class worker, and the military and police instead of the issue of money as the rothchilds had once wielded. beginning with the great depression the managerial elite took power. their values were procedure, specific to a situation like federal and state regulations, separating ownership from control
>you own the farm, but i run it for you
thusly, a manager is valued by the amount of complexity he manages. for example i would have an incentive to introduce complexity where none existed because it would allow me to gain value while hiring more managers. the chief diversity officer is a perfect example of this.
their power centers are the managerial class, the welfare recipient class, and the bureaucracy. if you ever wondered why the very rich and very poor tend to vote for centre-left parties in the west, this is likely the reason why
amazon, for example, is an incredibly complex business that requires many echelons of managers. bezos also owns the washington post which doesn't turn a profit, to spread the news he wants spread. he benefits from this complex interrelationship and the welfare state being able to subsidize his (and his friends') underpaid workers in addition to the lower leeching welfare (meaning those who do not necessarily NEED it) class siphoning taxpayer dollars.
anyway, ask me anything
MAGA
illegitimate elitism is the problem. those who understand noblesse oblige understand that workers need to be productive and loyal, and that loyalty is a two way street.
the supposed bigger issue here is the managerial revolution. they had both ownership and control, and their traditional power centers were the business owner-operator, the middle class worker, and the military and police instead of the issue of money as the rothchilds had once wielded. beginning with the great depression the managerial elite took power. their values were procedure, specific to a situation like federal and state regulations, separating ownership from control
>you own the farm, but i run it for you
thusly, a manager is valued by the amount of complexity he manages. for example i would have an incentive to introduce complexity where none existed because it would allow me to gain value while hiring more managers. the chief diversity officer is a perfect example of this.
their power centers are the managerial class, the welfare recipient class, and the bureaucracy. if you ever wondered why the very rich and very poor tend to vote for centre-left parties in the west, this is likely the reason why
amazon, for example, is an incredibly complex business that requires many echelons of managers. bezos also owns the washington post which doesn't turn a profit, to spread the news he wants spread. he benefits from this complex interrelationship and the welfare state being able to subsidize his (and his friends') underpaid workers in addition to the lower leeching welfare (meaning those who do not necessarily NEED it) class siphoning taxpayer dollars.
anyway, ask me anything
MAGA
7/8/2025, 8:28:15 PM
inequality is the natural state and therefore inevitable; true equality only exists in mathematics and i have no issue with the existence of elites
illegitimate elitism is the problem. those who understand noblesse oblige understand that workers need to be productive and loyal, and that loyalty is a two way street.
the supposed bigger issue here is the managerial revolution. they had both ownership and control, and their traditional power centers were the business owner-operator, the middle class worker, and the military and police instead of the issue of money as the rothchilds had once wielded. beginning with the great depression the managerial elite took power. their values were procedure, specific to a situation like federal and state regulations, separating ownership from control
>you own the farm, but i run it for you
thusly, a manager is valued by the amount of complexity he manages. for example i would have an incentive to introduce complexity where none existed because it would allow me to gain value while hiring more managers. the chief diversity officer is a perfect example of this.
their power centers are the managerial class, the welfare recipient class, and the bureaucracy. if you ever wondered why the very rich and very poor tend to vote for centre-left parties in the west, this is likely the reason why
amazon, for example, is an incredibly complex business that requires many echelons of managers. bezos also owns the washington post which doesn't turn a profit, to spread the news he wants spread. he benefits from this complex interrelationship and the welfare state being able to subsidize his (and his friends') underpaid workers in addition to the lower leeching welfare (meaning those who do not necessarily NEED it) class siphoning taxpayer dollars.
anyway, ask me anything
illegitimate elitism is the problem. those who understand noblesse oblige understand that workers need to be productive and loyal, and that loyalty is a two way street.
the supposed bigger issue here is the managerial revolution. they had both ownership and control, and their traditional power centers were the business owner-operator, the middle class worker, and the military and police instead of the issue of money as the rothchilds had once wielded. beginning with the great depression the managerial elite took power. their values were procedure, specific to a situation like federal and state regulations, separating ownership from control
>you own the farm, but i run it for you
thusly, a manager is valued by the amount of complexity he manages. for example i would have an incentive to introduce complexity where none existed because it would allow me to gain value while hiring more managers. the chief diversity officer is a perfect example of this.
their power centers are the managerial class, the welfare recipient class, and the bureaucracy. if you ever wondered why the very rich and very poor tend to vote for centre-left parties in the west, this is likely the reason why
amazon, for example, is an incredibly complex business that requires many echelons of managers. bezos also owns the washington post which doesn't turn a profit, to spread the news he wants spread. he benefits from this complex interrelationship and the welfare state being able to subsidize his (and his friends') underpaid workers in addition to the lower leeching welfare (meaning those who do not necessarily NEED it) class siphoning taxpayer dollars.
anyway, ask me anything
6/27/2025, 3:04:03 AM
Page 1